fbicon    ticon    instagram-png-instagram-png-icon-36    

Cleveland Housing Court has jurisdiction over criminal cases filed by the City of Cleveland and the Village of Bratenahl against property owners or persons in control of property in these areas.

These criminal cases involve violations of city or state laws relating to housing, building, fire, zoning, agriculture, health, sidewalks, waste collection, safety and air pollution. Fines and jail time are punishable outcomes if found guilty. These offenses are minor misdemeanors or first degree misdemeanors. Convictions on these offenses are punishable by fines and jail time.

Housing Court's Role in Criminal Cases
As outlined by Judge Patrick Carroll in City of Lakewood v. Krebs, 150 Ohio Misc.2d 1, 901 N.E.2d 885, 2008-Ohio-7083:
  • In a criminal case, the prosecutor has complete discretion in deciding whether to bring a criminal charge, as well as the nature of the charge to bring.
  • While the court has a general interest in the building, health, and safety codes being followed, as with all criminal laws, it is not within the authority of the court to encourage the prosecutor to file a criminal case.
  • A judge is not a law-enforcement officer.  Judges and law-enforcement officers are separately defined, with separate duties and responsibilities.
  • The Ohio Supreme Court has noted, a “judge who observes a crime outside the courtroom has only the power of an ordinary citizen.”
  • The responsibility of a judge is to decide matters that have been submitted to the court by the parties.
  • A judge has no authority over a person or situation unless a case is properly filed and the court has jurisdiction.
  • A judge has no authority to decide the type or number of cases that will be filed with the court.  The judge is limited to hearing and issuing decisions in the cases that are filed with the court. The decision to file a criminal case rests solely with the prosecutor.
  • Once a criminal case is filed, the control of the case shifts from the prosecutor to the court. The judge decides, within the limits of the law, how a case is conducted, when hearings are held, and what evidence may be submitted.  If the judge or jury makes a finding of guilt, whether after a plea or a trial, it is the judge's responsibility to determine the sentence to be imposed.
Ex Parte Contacts and Communications
In general, a judge may not initiate, receive, permit, or consider ex parte communications. See Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct 2.9.  “Ex parte” means a communication from only one party to a dispute, without notice to or the presence of the other party.

There are new rules that apply to Judges and specialized dockets. When administering a specialized docket, such as Housing Court, a judge may initiate, receive, permit, or consider an ex parte communication, provided that the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a procedural, substantive, or tactical advantage while in the specialized docket as a result of the ex parte communication.  See CJC 2.9(A)(6).  In this capacity, judges may assume a more interactive role with parties, probation officers, social workers, and others.  See CJC 2.9 Comment 4A.



Cleveland Municipal Housing Court | 1200 Ontario Street, 13B | Cleveland, Ohio 44113 216.664.4295 | Contact Us |